|
Tuesday, 24 November 2009 01:47 |
|
Physics of the early Universe is at the boundary of astronomy and
philosophy since we do not currently have a complete theory that
unifies all the fundamental forces of Nature at the moment of
Creation. In addition, there is no possibility of linking
observation or experimentation of early Universe physics to our
theories (i.e. its not possible to `build' another Universe). Our
theories are rejected or accepted based on simplicity and aesthetic
grounds, plus there power of prediction to later times, rather than
an appeal to empirical results. This is a very difference way of
doing science from previous centuries of research.
|
|
Tuesday, 24 November 2009 01:45 |
|
The current observations and estimates of dark matter is that 20% of dark
matter is probably in the form of massive neutrinos, even though that mass
is uncertain. The another 5% to 10% is in the form of stellar remnants
and low mass, brown dwarfs. The rest of dark matter is called CDM (cold
dark matter) of unknown origin, but probably cold and heavy. The
combination of all these mixtures only makes 20 to 30% the amount mass
necessary to close the Universe. Thus, the Universe appears to be open,
i.e. ΩM is 0.3.
|
|
Tuesday, 24 November 2009 01:18 |
|
From comparing the mass estimates to the observed amount of light from
galaxies, and from the abundance of light elements, that there is a
problem with the fraction of the mass of the Universe that is in
normal matter or baryons. The fraction of light elements indicates
that the density of the Universe in baryons is only 2 to 4% what we
measure as the observed density. The rest of the mass appears to be
`missing', meaning unobserved or dark.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 6 of 65 |